Originally published on February 24, 2024
#80Npaseodeangel, #housetheft, bar attorneys, foreclosure eviction, foreclosure scam, Foreclosure, eviction, arrest, Illegal Foreclosure, New Mexico Tyranny, Unconstitutional Sheriffs, unlawful eviction
Are courts colluding with Wall Street? It should be no surprise that the judicial system is rigged toward Bar attorneys. They’re all part of the same club. In fact, bar membership fees help fund the “disciplinary board”. The disciplinary board is the agency tasked with disciplining bar attorneys. The “office of disciplinary counsel” is the keeper of the keys that decides whether a complaint should be passed on to the actual board, which consists of all bar attorneys and one token “lay” person. If it gets this far and the disciplinary board decides an attorney should be disciplined, then they make the recommendation to the supreme court justices. Guess what, they are also all bar attorneys. Once people truly understand the incestuous nature of the courts, then they might realize there is no such thing as “justice”. Keep this in mind as you read this article.
What does “Bar” Stand for?
What is the Bar? The meaning term “bar” refers to the partition or railing that separates the legal professionals from those watching the trial or other proceedings. Those on the inside of the bar include:
- Judges
- Attorneys
- Juries
- Plaintiffs and defendants
Why is it Called the Bar?
Is the Bar an abbreviation? In Britain, legal professionals were known as “barristers.” They were summoned to the “bar” to advocate for the interests of their clients during legal proceedings. In modern times, the “bar” is an association of lawyers who are licensed to practice. This is very similar to the term “bench,” which is associated with judges. Lawyers who pass the bar exam are licensed to practice within their particular jurisdiction. Going to law school is not sufficient for becoming a licensed attorney or bar member.
Each state in the country determines specific requirements for attorneys who wish to practice. States also disallow attorneys from representing clients without the proper licensing.
What is a “special master”?
We have figured out what is going on in foreclosure as far as a “special master’s sale”, or maybe we should say, what is not going on. When people truly grasp the reality of the situation, hopefully they will start seeking reform of the judicial system. In short, foreclosures are handed out like candy and the taking of property is a foregone conclusion. Those who have profited the most from the scheme are not even trying to pretend to follow constitutional requirements, this includes the judges – all judges, from “people’s”, e.g. magistrate court judges to state court judges to appellate court judges to supreme court justices. We believe this is due the entanglement among states and counties with investments in “mortgage-backed securities”. In truth, MBSs are a scam.
In the law of the United States, a special master is generally a subordinate official appointed by a judge to ensure judicial orders are followed, or in the alternative, to hear evidence on behalf of the judge and make recommendations to the judge as to the disposition of a matter. The special master should not be confused with the traditional common law concept of a master, a judge of the High Court entrusted to deal with summary and administrative matters falling short of a full trial. In the federal judiciary of the United States, a special master is an adjunct to a federal court. Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a federal court to appoint a special master, with the consent of the parties, to conduct proceedings and report to the Court.
“Special Master’s” Sales Validate an Invalid Judgment
Today, let’s talk about special master sales in New Mexico courts. For this article, we are sharing a briefing in a lawsuit against the special master, which began as a complaint for enforcement of the public records law of New Mexico, “Inspection of Public Records Act”, or IPRA. The complaint was later amended to add the court’s record custodian and the special master under a claim for unauthorized practice of law. The briefing on the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on her UPL claim gives the picture of what is going on in foreclosures across the state, and what happens during the most critical part of the case – the deprivation of property.
First, recognize that few foreclosure cases go to trial. Where summary judgment is frowned upon by the courts, in foreclosure cases it is the rule, rather than the exception. More than one (non-foreclosure) attorney has been surprised by this fact because, “summary judgment is incredibly difficult to obtain”. When it comes to most foreclosures, and summary judgments, rarely is evidence introduced and summary judgment is granted based on a single allegation – that the plaintiff was in possession of a note “endorsed” in blank when the lawsuit was commenced. Mind you, this is just what “establishes” standing, it does not prove standing. Yet, courts across the state grant foreclosure judgments just based on this allegation. This is, of course, because most foreclosures of today are filed by third parties who claim to have acquired the note through negotiation. In truth, the notes are “bundled” into securitized trusts and chopped up into securities. This operation materially changes the nature of the instrument. The late Neil Garfield covered this at length in his blog livinglies.me. In truth, they don’t even properly do this. It’s all an illusion.
What is a summary judgment?
A summary judgment is a decision made by the court on the basis of statements and evidence presented in the legal pleadings and documents filed, without a trial. It is used when there is no dispute as to the facts of the case, and one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. From US legal.com
So, as it is today, homeowners are losing properties through foreclosure without a shred of evidence that the plaintiff had any right to any funds or the property – even less the property. The way they are taking property flies in the face of constitutional protections. Before anyone can be deprived of property, they must be given due process. This means that all provisions of the constitution must be followed, including a trial by jury (the seventh amendment). If you borrow money from someone and that person labored for that money, then you have to pay them back. But, what if the person trying to collect from you did nothing to acquire the “note” they claim you owe? This is not equitable and, moreover, if the taking of actual property is involved, they must prove a right to that property with actual evidence. This is not happening in foreclosures and the reason is because of the judges.
Here’s a breakdown of what is happening in a foreclosure sale, and it is essentially all proven in this briefing. First, the motion provides several discovery responses from the special master so you see, in his own words, what is going on. The response by the special master’s attorney also agrees that the facts in the motion are undisputed. They go further, however, to disclose that the attorney for the plaintiff and the judge work together to deprive the defendant of property and that evidence of a sale or that consideration was paid is “not required” and all that is needed is a judge’s signature confirming the non-existent sale.
What evidence is there that banks are continuing criminal enterprises and colluding with Wall Street attorneys?
How do these entities stay in business after being fined BILLIONS of dollars?
These are just a few examples of news you never hear on the Associated Press or other legacy media outlets;
Bank of America
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Bank+of+America+bank+consent+orders&t=ftsa&atb=v285-1&ia=web
Wells Fargo Bank
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Wells+Fargo+bank+consent+orders&t=ftsa&atb=v285-1&ia=web
U.S. Bank
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=U.S.+bank+consent+orders&t=ftsa&atb=v285-1&ia=web
JP Morgan
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=JP+Morgan+bank+consent+orders&t=ftsa&atb=v285-1&ia=web
Citi Bank
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Citi+Bank+bank+consent+orders&t=ftsa&atb=v285-1&ia=web
Here are some questions that are very uncomfortable for bank attorneys and judges to answer:
Why are some judges appointed and not elected?
What is “due process” in a foreclosure complaint and then sale?
Does PERA (Public Employees Retirement) hold investments in mortgage backed products?
Are judges protecting their PERA accounts?
What does an “endorsement” mean in regard to the Mortgage Notes in a foreclosure case?
Why doesn’t the legacy media (Associated press for instance) report more on bank and servicer fraud?
Who was Lender Processing Systems? (LPS)
Did the State of New Mexico settle a lawsuit with LPS? What was that settlement?
Who was “Linda Greene”?
DISCLAIMER: We are NOT attorneys and this should not be construed as legal advice. If you require direct assistance, seek competent legal counsel (if you can find anyone willing to challenge the system. These unicorns are few and far between). Do not contact us directly for specific advice on anything posted in our blog. We will not respond.